New Jersey Man Arrested for Threatening Federal Judge, Facing Serious Charges

Repeated Threats and Outbursts Raise Concerns About Safety of Judiciary

A New Jersey man, Jonathan Williams, 46, was taken into custody on Wednesday after making alarming threats against a federal judge. According to prosecutors, Williams made multiple calls to the judge’s chambers, expressing violent intentions towards the judge.

During the first call, Williams discussed a civil suit in which he was involved and demanded immediate action for his settlement. In the second call, he threatened the judge with injury and used the insulting phrase, “Before the snow starts falling on my head, I’m gonna put a bullet in the Judge’s brain.”

A later call to the judge’s chambers, this time overheard by U.S. Marshals, included sexually-explicit, profane, and racist remarks directed at the employee who answered the phone. Williams reiterated his threat to harm the judge and warned the employee about losing their job.

On another occasion, Williams attempted to enter a Newark law firm but was denied entry by security. He reacted by shouting that he would “blow the judge’s brains out” before leaving the premises.

Williams is facing significant accusations for making threats to kill and attack a federal judge. If found guilty, he may get a $250k fine in addition to a maximum 10-year jail term. Notably, this is not the first instance of Williams making threatening remarks, as sources revealed he was previously arrested for threatening a Newark city council member.

Read: casa do albergado de manaus ( 04.312.401/0004-80 casa do albergado de manaus

Law enforcement agencies remain vigilant against threats directed at federal judges, a concern amplified by a tragic incident in July 2020. A guy who had previously written anti-feminist articles murdered the son of an American during that incident. District Judge Esther Salas and injured her husband at their New Jersey home.

Jonathan Williams is scheduled for a virtual hearing at 2 p.m. on Thursday. The case underscores the need for safety precautions and measures to protect the judiciary from potential harm.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button